PSYC FPX 2210 Week 2 Assessment: Law and Politics in Social Media

PSYC FPX 2210 Week 2 Assessment: Law and Politics in Social Media

Student Name

Capella University

PSYC-FPX2210 Introduction to Psychology of Social Media

Prof. Name:

Date

Law and Politics

The Expanding Role of the Internet in Society

The Internet has become one of the most transformative technological innovations of the modern era, reshaping how individuals connect, communicate, and share information. Globally, people can now access immense quantities of data on virtually any subject imaginable, allowing for instant research, entertainment, and social interaction. Online platforms facilitate collaboration and provide spaces for like-minded individuals to exchange ideas and engage in public discourse. The Internet has redefined everyday human experiences such as education, commerce, recreation, information sharing, and community participation, all at minimal financial cost.

Importantly, the rise of the Internet has had an equally profound impact on political systems and communication. Digital technologies are now deeply intertwined with political participation and policymaking. Social media platforms and online tools have become vital channels for political messaging, campaign organization, and civic engagement. Government officials increasingly rely on digital communication to introduce legislation, promote public policies, and engage with constituents.

The Intersection of Free Speech and Government Expression

The interaction between the Internet and politics also raises complex constitutional issues, particularly concerning First Amendment rights in the United States. When government officials create social media accounts or digital forums for public interaction, they must navigate the tension between public discourse and government-controlled expression. If officials restrict or silence opposing viewpoints on these platforms, they risk violating constitutional principles of free speech.

According to the government speech theory, such expression—when initiated by government officials—represents the official position of the state. This doctrine acknowledges that while the government has the right to express its views, it must also maintain transparency and accountability to preserve democratic debate (Norton, as cited in original text).

Topic Area

The Use of the Internet in Political Mobilization

This discussion explores how political entities and individuals leverage the Internet to advance their political agendas. Numerous online hubs now provide citizens with direct access to political data, digital discussions, and feedback systems, enhancing interaction between politicians and the public. Such digital tools can revitalize civic engagement by offering citizens greater influence over political processes and improving transparency.

Zukin et al. (2006) highlighted that modern democracies face declining political participation, which can be mitigated through increased online engagement. The Internet serves as a potential remedy by giving people renewed access to political spaces once dominated by elite actors.

However, challenges persist. Access inequality, often referred to as the digital divide, continues to separate “information haves” from “information have-nots” (Shelton et al., 2022). Limited access to Internet technologies can deepen social and economic inequities, particularly among marginalized groups. Additionally, concerns over data privacy, misinformation, and political manipulation remain prevalent (Baron, 2003).

Challenges of Internet Use in Politics	Description
Digital Divide	Disparities in access to technology create unequal political participation opportunities.
Information Accuracy	Ensuring credible political data remains a persistent issue online.
Privacy Concerns	The potential misuse of personal information in political campaigns.
Institutional Resistance	Political organizations may resist adapting to digital systems due to traditional bureaucratic practices.

Furthermore, while the Internet can foster civic engagement, it is crucial not to idealize it as a universal solution to political disengagement. Its impact on democratic processes depends heavily on how effectively citizens, politicians, and institutions adapt to these technologies.

Attention and Engagement

The Role of Social Media in Political Interaction

Social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram have transformed political communication and mobilization strategies. Engaging followers through consistent, informative, and interactive content strengthens relationships between political figures and their audiences. Studies suggest that digital responsiveness—answering public queries and encouraging discourse—enhances audience loyalty and promotes deeper political engagement.

Social media also amplifies public protest and collective action. Big Data analytics enable researchers to track the diffusion of information and coordination during major social movements. Evidence from demonstrations in the United States, Spain, Turkey, and Ukraine reveals that these platforms facilitate not only the logistical coordination of protests (e.g., transportation, safety, legal support) but also the emotional and motivational narratives that sustain movements.

Friendship Networks and Civic Motivation

A lesser-studied factor in political mobilization is the role of digital friendship networks. Online friendships often serve as conduits for trust and influence, motivating users to engage in civic behavior. Understanding these relational dynamics is critical for assessing how social media encourages active citizenship.

Functions of Social Media in Political Participation	Examples
Coordination of Events	Disseminating logistical information for protests and campaigns.
Emotional Exchange	Sharing motivational stories or solidarity messages.
Network Building	Forming supportive communities around causes.
Data Analysis	Tracking engagement patterns and sentiment analysis for policy insights.

Benefits of Social Media Use

Enhancing Communication and Connectivity

In Australia and beyond, social networking sites (SNS) such as Facebook and Twitter have become essential to daily communication. Younger generations, in particular, use these platforms consistently for personal, social, and political engagement. While much of the public discourse emphasizes the negative effects of SNS use, emerging evidence points to substantial benefits (Wang et al., 2009).

Social networking fosters social inclusion, supports education and civic awareness, and enables global dialogue. In academic, sociological, and cultural contexts, SNS platforms offer opportunities for collaborative learning, public participation, and the exchange of diverse perspectives.

Positive Impacts of Social Media	Impact Area
Educational Collaboration	Facilitates group learning and information sharing.
Civic Engagement	Encourages participation in social and political issues.
Cultural Exchange	Promotes intercultural understanding and global awareness.
Health Awareness	Disseminates important public health information.

The Australian experience demonstrates that social media can act as a tool for empowerment, especially when used responsibly and critically.

Risks of Social Media Use

Emerging Threats and Misinformation

While social media platforms offer numerous advantages, they also pose significant risks to political integrity and information security. Businesses and organizations use social media for functions such as product development, supply chain management, and customer interaction. This extensive reliance on social media introduces vulnerabilities, including exposure to misinformation and cyber threats (Jeble et al., 2017).

Social media has become a double-edged sword: while it enables real-time communication and collaboration, it also serves as a conduit for false narratives, particularly during global crises such as COVID-19. For example, misinformation about virus strains, treatments, and vaccines spread rapidly across platforms (Krishnan et al., 2021).

Risks of Social Media in Political and Social Contexts	Consequences
Misinformation	Spread of false or misleading political and health-related data.
Cybersecurity Threats	Unauthorized data access or manipulation.
Echo Chambers	Reinforcement of biased or polarized viewpoints.
Ethical Issues	Misuse of user data for manipulation or targeted propaganda.

Hence, while social media enhances communication efficiency, it also demands stringent regulation, digital literacy, and accountability to safeguard users’ rights.

Conclusion

The integration of social media and Internet technologies into political communication has reshaped the landscape of civic engagement. However, merely using social media does not guarantee political success. The outcomes depend on strategic planning, audience engagement, and ethical data management.

Political parties, advocacy groups, and non-profit organizations can leverage social media to improve collaboration and transparency, provided they balance enthusiasm with caution. Future research should explore how diverse social media strategies affect public participation and political trust.

References

Baron, D. P. (2003). Private politics. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 12(1), 31–66.

Jeble, S., Kumari, S., & Patil, Y. (2017). Role of big data in decision making. Operations and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(1), 36–44.

Krishnan, N., Gu, J., Tromble, R., & Abroms, L. C. (2021). Research note: Examining how various social media platforms have responded to COVID-19 misinformation. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 2(6), 1–25.

Shelton, C., El-Boghdadly, K., & Appleby, J. B. (2022). The ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots’ of personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic: The ethics of emerging inequalities amongst healthcare workers. Journal of Medical Ethics, 48(10), 653–657.

PSYC FPX 2210 Week 2 Assessment: Law and Politics in Social Media

Wang, F., Camacho, E., & Xu, K. (2009, June). Positive influence dominating set in online social networks. In International Conference on Combinatorial Optimization and Applications (pp. 313–321). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K., & Carpini, M. X. D. (2006). A new engagement?: Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. Oxford University Press.

---