PSYC FPX 2002 Assessment 2 CRAAP Test & Library Worksheet

PSYC FPX 2002 Assessment 2 CRAAP Test & Library Worksheet

Student Name

Capella University

PSYC-FPX2002 The Skillful Psychology Student

Prof. Name:

Date

PART 1: A Source from the Internet – CRAAP Test

Overview

The CRAAP Test is a valuable tool for assessing the quality and reliability of information found online. It evaluates sources based on Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose, helping researchers determine if a source is suitable for academic or professional use. The following evaluation applies the CRAAP Test to an internet article related to a psychological topic.

Name of Article

Title: [Insert the name of the selected online article here related to psychology]

Currency: The Timeliness of the Information

Currency refers to how recent and updated the information is, which is crucial in psychology since new findings emerge frequently.

Questions and Responses:

Question	Answer
1. Is the information current enough (in psychology, usually within 5 years)?	Yes, the article was published within the last five years, ensuring its relevance to current psychological research.
2. Has the information or website been revised or updated in the past 6 months?	The website shows periodic updates, indicating that the authors maintain the accuracy and timeliness of the content.
3. Are the links functional?	Most hyperlinks were active and redirected to credible external references.

Score: 5

Summary: Although the article is relatively current and updated periodically, the presence of a few broken links slightly lowers its currency rating.

Relevance: The Importance of the Information for Your Needs

Relevance measures how closely the information matches the research topic and its usefulness for the intended academic purpose.

Questions and Responses:

Question	Answer
1. Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question?	Yes, the content directly addresses ethical behavior and decision-making in psychology.
2. Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e., not too elementary or too advanced)?	The information is moderately advanced, suitable for undergraduate or graduate research.
3. Have you looked at a variety of sources before choosing this one?	Yes, several other sources were reviewed, but this one offered a comprehensive overview of the topic.

Score: 7

Summary: The article demonstrates strong relevance to the topic and academic requirements, with adequate depth and detail.

Authority: The Source of the Information

Authority examines the qualifications and credibility of the author and publisher.

Questions and Responses:

Question	Answer
1. Are you able to determine who is the author and publisher of the information?	Yes, the author and publisher are clearly identified on the website.
2. Can you verify the author or publisher’s credentials as a respected expert on the topic?	The author holds advanced credentials in psychology and has published extensively on ethical behavior.
3. Does the URL help you determine the source? (.edu; .com; .gov; .org)	The URL ends with “.org,” suggesting a nonprofit or educational organization, which adds credibility.

Score: 10

Summary: The author’s credentials and affiliation with a reputable institution significantly enhance the source’s authority.

Accuracy: The Reliability, Truthfulness, and Correctness of the Content

Accuracy ensures that the information is factual, verifiable, and unbiased.

Questions and Responses:

Question	Answer
1. Did the author back up statements with credible evidence and list/link to verifiable sources?	Yes, most claims were supported by peer-reviewed research and reliable statistics.
2. Is the information free of spelling, grammar, or other typographical errors?	The article was largely free of grammatical or typographical mistakes.
3. Does the language or tone seem unbiased and free of emotion?	While mostly objective, certain sections contained persuasive undertones.

Score: 5

Summary: The article presents accurate information but could be improved by removing slight bias in tone and ensuring all claims are fully referenced.

Purpose: The Reason the Information Exists

Purpose identifies the motivation behind the content — whether it aims to inform, persuade, entertain, or sell.

Questions and Responses:

Question	Answer
1. Is the purpose to inform (and not to sell, entertain, or persuade)?	The content primarily seeks to inform but contains occasional promotional material.
2. Is the information fact and not opinion or propaganda?	While much of it is factual, some opinion-based commentary is evident.
3. Is the source free of ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?	The article displays minimal bias, but some sections reflect cultural perspectives.

Score: 2

Summary: Although the information has educational intent, the presence of promotional material and minor biases lowers its objectivity.

Overall Scoring

Category	Score
Currency	5
Relevance	7
Authority	10
Accuracy	5
Purpose	2
Total Score	29

Evaluation Result:
With a total score of 29, this source falls below the acceptable threshold for reliable academic use. It may still provide contextual understanding but should not be cited as a primary source in coursework.

PART 2: A Source from the Library – Library Worksheet

Locating the Article

The selected scholarly source was located in the Capella University Library using the Summon search tool. The keywords “learning information,” “ethical decision making,” and “simulation game” were used to identify the article.

Article Details

Question	Response
1. What is the full title of the article?	Learning Information Ethical Decision Making With a Simulation Game
2. What is the name of the professional journal in which this article appears?	Frontiers in Psychology
3. What volume of the journal contains this article?	Volume 13
4. What is the DOI of this article?	10.3389/fpsyg.2022.933298
5. Is this a scientific research article or an editorial/commentary?	Scientific Research Article

Summary of the Article’s Purpose

The article by Lin, Wang, and Yueh (2022) explores the effectiveness of simulation-based learning in teaching ethical decision-making in information management. By engaging students in a virtual environment that mimics real-life ethical challenges—such as data privacy and accuracy—the authors demonstrate how interactive learning can enhance students’ ability to apply ethical principles in practical scenarios.

Summary of the Authors’ Conclusions

Lin, Wang, and Yueh (2022) conclude that immersive simulation games significantly improve students’ ethical awareness and reasoning. Participants who engaged in the simulation demonstrated stronger decision-making skills and a more comprehensive understanding of ethical theories. The authors emphasize that experiential learning environments foster critical thinking and ethical sensitivity, which are essential for future professionals managing information responsibly.

APA In-text Citation

(Lin, Wang, & Yueh, 2022)

APA Reference

Lin, W., Wang, J., & Yueh, H. (2022). Learning information ethical decision making with a simulation game. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 933298. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.933298

Time Management Reflection

Question	Response
11. How much time did it take to complete this exercise and worksheet?	More time than I planned or expected
12. What changes do you intend to make in your future time management planning?	In future study sessions, I plan to allocate at least one additional hour each evening for reading and analysis. This will ensure sufficient time to comprehend material deeply rather than rushing to locate answers. Additionally, creating a weekly schedule with dedicated blocks for research will improve overall efficiency and reduce stress.

References

California State University, Chico. (n.d.). CRAAP test worksheet. Meriam Library. https://library.csuchico.edu

PSYC FPX 2002 Assessment 2 CRAAP Test & Library Worksheet

Lin, W., Wang, J., & Yueh, H. (2022). Learning information ethical decision making with a simulation game. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 933298. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.933298

---