NURSING-ESSAY-HELP

The performance assessments in the Learning Experience Design (LXD) Foundations I and II courses cover the five stages of design thinking: empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test

Take My Online Class

The performance assessments in the Learning Experience Design (LXD) Foundations I and II courses cover the five stages of design thinking: empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test

Introduction

Buy ready-to-submit essays. No Plagiarism Guarantee

Note: All our papers are written by real people, not generated by AI.

The performance assessments in the Learning Experience Design (LXD) Foundations I and II courses cover the five stages of design thinking: empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test. In this task, you will begin the ideate stage, in which you will generate solutions to an instructional problem using design thinking and practical application of learning theories.

In LXD Foundations I, you chose one of the case studies, found in the Web Links section, to guide your work. The same case study will be used throughout this course (LXD Foundations II). It is important to note that these case studies are designed to provide sample instructional scenarios. In an authentic design thinking project, the information presented would normally be obtained by gathering data and perspectives in your instructional setting directly from the target learners and from other team members, stakeholders, and subject matter experts. All three case studies can be found in the Web Links section of this task for easy reference.

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your ASSIGNMENT and we will find the best WRITER for your paper.

Get Help Now!

For this task, you will ideate solutions to the instructional problem from Task 2 of LXD Foundations I with the goal of generating an e-learning solution. As part of your ideation experience, you will be required to describe your ideation process, as well as explain key attributes of your ideas in order to demonstrate the degree of alignment to the instructional problem and the needs of your target learners. Your ideation work will inform the storyboard for a one-hour e-learning module you will create in Task 2.

Requirements

Your submission must represent your original work and understanding of the course material. Most performance assessment submissions are automatically scanned through the WGU similarity checker. Students are strongly encouraged to wait for the similarity report to generate after uploading their work and then review it to ensure Academic Authenticity guidelines are met before submitting the file for evaluation. See Understanding Similarity Reports for more information.

Grammarly Note:
Professional Communication will be automatically assessed through Grammarly for Education in most performance assessments before a student submits work for evaluation. Students are strongly encouraged to review the Grammarly for Education feedback prior to submitting work for evaluation, as the overall submission will not pass without this aspect passing. See Use Grammarly for Education Effectively for more information.

Microsoft Files Note: 
Write your paper in Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) unless another Microsoft product, or pdf, is specified in the task directions. Tasks may not be submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc.  All supporting documentation, such as screenshots and proof of experience, should be collected in a pdf file and submitted separately from the main file. For more information, please see Computer System and Technology Requirements.

You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

Generate a solution to an instructional problem represented in your chosen case study, found in the Web Links section, by doing the following:

Note: The tasks in LXD Foundations I and LXD Foundations II are designed to be completed in order, using the same case study throughout, to simulate the design thinking process from start to finish.

A.   Include the following sections of your passing submission from LXD Foundations I to provide context for your identified instructional problem and learner population:

•    the target audience analysis from Task 2, parts A1–A3 (LXD Foundations I)

•    the problem statement from Task 2, part A4 (LXD Foundations I)

•    the learning goal and learning objectives from Task 2, parts B and C (LXD Foundations I)

Note: The sections from the previously completed task should be copied and pasted within one document along with the submission for the rest of this task. The previously evaluated sections will not be reevaluated for quality, but they are necessary to include to provide context as you work through each phase of the design process.

B.   Using design thinking methods, ideate potential original e-learning solutions to address the instructional problem from LXD Foundations I by doing the following:

1.   Explain your experience engaging in the ideation process, including how your experience exemplifies divergent thinking.

2.   Provide an artifact related to your ideation experience (e.g., diagram, outline, graphic organizer, or any other medium that displays your work).

3.   Identify three distinct ideas generated from your ideation process and explain how each idea addresses the instructional problem.

C.   Explain how you could develop one of your ideas in part B into an original one-hour e-learning module by doing the following:

Note: You will prototype this idea as a one-hour e-learning module in Tasks 2 and 3.

1.   Provide one observable learning objective aligned to the learning goal in part A that your one-hour e-learning module will address.

Note: Your learning objective may be one of the learning objectives you submitted in LXD Foundations I Task 2, or you may revise or refine a learning objective so it is better suited for a one-hour e-learning module and will better meet the requirements of this task. The learning objective should still align to the learning goal.

2.   Describe how you could develop one idea—either from part B3 or a new idea—into an original one-hour e-learning module to solve the instructional problem.

3.   Explain how learners will learn the concepts and skills to achieve the learning objective in part C1.

Note: The explanation should focus on the learners’ experience of learning important concepts and skills. It may include tools, resources, and instructional components, but the focus should be on how learners interact and engage with these components to learn.

4.   Explain how a specific learning theory could support the learning process within the e-learning module.

5.   Explain how learning could be measured (i.e., assessed) within the e-learning module.

6.   Explain how the e-learning module will meet the needs of the target learners.

D.   Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

E.   Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

File Restrictions
File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )
File size limit: 200 MB
File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, csv, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z
Rubric

DISPOSITIONS:

Not Evident

The submission demonstrates both behavior and disposition that conflict with professional or ethical standards.

Approaching Competence

The submission demonstrates behavior or disposition that conflicts with professional or ethical standards.

Competent

The submission demonstrates behavior and disposition that align with professional and ethical standards.

A:CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION

Not Evident

1 or more of the given sections from LXD Foundations I are missing or incomplete.

Approaching Competence

Not applicable.

Competent

All of the given sections from LXD Foundations I are provided.

B1:IDEATION PROCESS

Not Evident

The submission does not explain the WGU learner’s experience of engaging in the ideation process.

Approaching Competence

The submission explains the WGU learner’s experience of engaging in the ideation process, but divergent thinking is not evident in the explained process of ideating solutions to the instructional problem, or the explanation is illogical.

Competent

The submission logically explains the WGU learner’s experience of engaging in the process of ideating solutions to the instructional problem, including how it exemplifies divergent thinking.

B2:IDEATION ARTIFACT

Not Evident

An artifact is not provided.

Approaching Competence

The artifact does not align with the ideation process explained in part B1 or does not demonstrate divergent thinking.

Competent

The artifact aligns with the ideation experience explained in part B1 and demonstrates divergent thinking.

B3:IDEAS

Not Evident

The submission neither identifies 3 ideas nor explains how the ideas address the instructional problem.

Approaching Competence

The submission identifies 3 ideas for a solution to the instructional problem, but the ideas are not distinct. Or the submission does not logically explain how each idea addresses the instructional problem.

Competent

The submission identifies 3 distinct ideas for a solution to the instructional problem and logically explains how each idea addresses the instructional problem.

C1:LEARNING OBJECTIVE

Not Evident

A learning objective is not provided.

Approaching Competence

The provided learning objective is not observable, is not aligned to the learning goal in part A, or is not appropriate for a one-hour e-learning module.

Competent

An appropriate, observable learning objective aligned to the learning goal in part A is provided.

C2:E-LEARNING MODULE

Not Evident

The submission does not provide a description.

Approaching Competence

The submission describes 1 idea, but it cannot be logically developed into a one-hour e-learning module. Or the description does not address how the idea would solve the instructional problem.

Competent

The submission describes how 1 idea could be logically developed into a one-hour e-learning module to solve the instructional problem.

C3:HOW LEARNING OCCURS

Not Evident

The submission does not provide an explanation.

Approaching Competence

The submission provides an explanation, but the explanation does not logically address how learning occurs or does not include specific details about instructional components. Or it does not address the learning objective in part C1.

Competent

The submission provides a logical explanation that addresses how learning occurs, including specific details about instructional components. The explanation addresses the learning objective in part C1.

C4:SPECIFIC LEARNING THEORIES

Not Evident

The submission does not explain how a learning theory could support the learning process within the e-learning module.

Approaching Competence

The submission does not logically explain how a learning theory could support the learning process, or the explanation does not include a specific learning theory, or the theory does not align with the e-learning module.

Competent

The submission logically explains how a specific learning theory could support the learning process within the e-learning module.

C5:MEASUREMENT OF LEARNING

Not Evident

The submission does not explain how learning could be measured.

Approaching Competence

The submission explains how learning could be measured, but the explanation is illogical, or the ideas for measurement are not appropriate for the e-learning module described in part C2.

Competent

The submission logically explains how learning could be measured, and the ideas for measurement are appropriate for the e-learning module described in part C2.

C6:LEARNERS’ NEEDS

Not Evident

The submission does not provide an explanation of how the e-learning module will meet the needs of the target learners.

Approaching Competence

The submission does not logically explain how the e-learning module meets the needs of the target learners, or the explanation does not include specific details of how the needs of target learners will be met.

Competent

The submission logically explains how the e-learning module would meet the needs of the target learners, including specific details of how the needs of target learners will be met.

D:SOURCES

Not Evident

The submission does not include both in-text citations and a reference list for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

Approaching Competence

The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list; however, the citations and/or reference list is incomplete or inaccurate.

Competent

The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that accurately identifies the author, date, title, and source location as available.

E:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION

Not Evident

This submission includes pervasive errors in professional communication related to grammar, sentence fluency, contextual spelling, or punctuation, negatively impacting the professional quality and clarity of the writing. Specific errors have been identified by Grammarly for Education under the Correctness category.

Approaching Competence

This submission includes substantial errors in professional communication related to grammar, sentence fluency, contextual spelling, or punctuation. Specific errors have been identified by Grammarly for Education under the Correctness category.

Competent

This submission includes satisfactory use of grammar, sentence fluency, contextual spelling, and punctuation, which promote accurate interpretation and understanding.

Web Links

Higher Education Case Study
K–12 Case Study
Workforce Case Study

Need help with a similar assignment? Our experts can write a 100% original version for you

Chat Directly with Us on WhatsApp

Get Fast Writing Help – No Plagiarism Guarantee!

Need assistance with your writing? Look no further! Our team of skilled writers is prepared to provide you with prompt writing help. Rest assured, your work will be entirely original and free from any plagiarism, as we offer a guarantee against it. Experience swift and dependable writing assistance by reaching out to us today!

Top-Rated Essay Writing Service | GET Flawless papers for All Your classes!

PLACE YOUR ORDER

Urgent essay writing service